Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I would like to put across my view on this debate if I may.I have been interested in the Green Stone and its history for some time, I have often looked at this site amongst others, although have never felt compelled to post until now. Personally, I feel that some viable and important criticism has been made – simply to dismiss this is surely not a good way to debate the issue.
It has been alleged that Crowley was demonic. Whilst we cannot be sure of his motives or actions at any given time, we should surely question what motive he had in guiding Andrew Collins to the proposed ‘holy grail’.
We should surely question (at the very least) whether anyone who has claimed to be led by the spirit of such a man (as Mr Collins has) would really be a good candidate to own such an incredible spiritual relic. I would certainly question his motives. However, from reading other posts on this site, it seems as though some people here have already almost decided that Mr Collins should be the owner, and it seems that anyone who questions this is instantly reprimanded. Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that this forum is mainly one for friends and supporters of Mr Collins and therefore contributes very little to the debate about who is really worthy of having such a relic. Please be aware that I am personally not interested in owning it and so have no ulterior motive here – but I am concerned about the nature and tone of some of the posts here and would like to think that it is indeed an equal playing field. Last but not least, having been following the history of this subject for so long, I would greatly like to see this go to someone who will use it for good.
